An
arbitrator
has
ordered
the
State
of
Maine
to
reinstate,
with
back
pay,
a
Maine
Bureau
of
Insurance
worker
whom
it
fired
in
2010
for
marrying
an
insurance
company
manager
two
years
earlier.
"Most
of
the
people
I've
shared
my
story
with
look
at
me
and
say,
'Okay,
what
did
you
really
get
fired
for?'
No
one
can
believe
I
got
fired
just
because
of
my
marriage,
but
it's
true,"
Michael
Nadeau
said.
"It's
right
there
in
my
letter
of
termination."
Anne
Head,
commissioner
of
the
Maine
Department
of
Financial
and
Professional
Regulation,
wrote
to
Nadeau
in
June
2010:
"Your
marriage
to
an
insurance
company
manager
represents
a
conflict
of
interest.
As
a
result
of
this
determination,
your
employment
with
the
Bureau
of
Insurance
will
cease."
Nadeau,
a
13-year
employee,
had
risen
to
the
rank
of
examiner
in
charge
at
the
time
of
his
dismissal.
He
had
an
excellent
work
record,
and
promoted
steadily
to
the
position
of
examiner
in
charge.
He
and
his
union,
the
Maine
State
Employees
Association,
Local
1989
of
the
Service
Employees
International
Union,
fought
his
dismissal
as
lacking
any
basis
in
Maine
law
and
violating
his
contractual
rights.
Maine
law
requires
employees
to
disclose
any
conflicts
of
interest
involving
a
spouse,
and
to
abstain
from
performing
any
work
that
would
create
such
a
conflict.
Before
his
dismissal,
Nadeau
had
made
multiple
disclosures
about
his
relationship:
in
2005
before
he
and
the
insurance
company
manager
started
dating,
in
2006
when
they
moved
in
together,
in
2008
when
they
got
married,
and
twice
in
2010
when
a
supervisor
ordered
him
to
perform
work
that
he
knew
would
pose
a
conflict
of
interest.
Nadeau
even
asked
for
a
written
opinion
on
the
matter,
which
the
state
responded
to
by
firing
him.
"None
of
the
statutory
provisions
introduced
in
the
record
clearly
compelled
Nadeau's
termination,"
arbitrator
Joseph
M.
Daly
wrote
in
a
decision
dated
Jan.
26,
2012.
"Nor
is
there
any
evidence
that
the
Bureau
considered
any
alternatives
to
termination
in
assignment
of
duties
to
Nadeau,
which
from
a
legal
and
operational
perspective
would
have
allowed
for
his
continued
employment.
In
simpler
terms,
there
is
no
record
evidence
that
the
State
made
sufficient
efforts
to
make
sure
it
was
right."
"Michael
Nadeau
complied
with
the
relevant
conflict
of
interest
laws
and
did
the
right
thing
every
step
of
the
way,
yet
the
state
fired
him
based
on
shoddy
legal
research
by
an
assistant
attorney
general
who
applied
the
wrong
statute,"
said
Tim
Belcher,
general
counsel
for
the
Maine
State
Employees
Association.
"Maine
law
simply
does
not
dictate
who
employees
can
marry.
Employees,
as
well
as
elected
and
appointed
officials,
all
are
free
to
marry
and
socialize
with
whomever
they
choose,
so
long
as
they
disclose
any
conflict
and
abstain
from
actions
that
directly
affect
their
family."
Michael
Nadeau
said:
"I
am
looking
forward
to
putting
this
all
behind
me
and
getting
on
with
my
life."