As
the
Stater
was
going
to
press,
our
union
was
pursuing
three
simultaneous
strategies
to
restore
longevity
pay
for
our
state
worker
members
who
had
it
removed
from
their
paychecks
by
the
Legislature
and
Governor.
These
strategies,
all
explained
in
detail
below,
are:
--
Our
legislation
known
as
L.D.
1594,
“An
Act
to
Restore
Longevity
Pay,”
sponsored
by
Senate
President
Elizabeth
Mitchell,
to
restore
longevity
pay
retroactive
to
July
1,
2009;
--
Our
four
class-action,
age-discrimination
complaints
that
we
filed
last
year
with
the
Maine
Human
Rights
Commission;
--
Our
memorandum
of
agreement
with
the
Baldacci
administration
to
restore
longevity
effective
July
1,
2010,
and
to
eliminate
the
administration’s
proposed
three
additional
shutdown
days,
both
in
exchange
for
a
payroll
push
that
would
move
the
June
29,
2011,
payday
for
Cycle
“A”
employees
forward
by
48
hours,
to
July
1,
2011.
L.D.
1594,
“An
Act
to
Restore
Longevity
Pay”
On
February
11,
MSEA-SEIU
members
packed
the
Appropriations
Committee
hearing
room
and
testified
in
favor
of
L.D.
1594,
“An
Act
to
Restore
Longevity
Pay,”
sponsored
by
Senate
President
Elizabeth
Mitchell.
This
legislation
would
restore
longevity
pay
retroactive
to
July
1,
2009.
Both
Sen.
Mitchell
and
Rep.
Patsy
Crockett,
co-sponsor,
testified
in
support
of
the
legislation,
as
did
several
MSEA-SEIU
members,
including
the
father-son
team
of
Richard
and
Jonathan
French.
“I
have
worked
as
a
chemist
at
the
Health
and
Environmental
Test
Laboratory
for
over
40
years
now,”
Richard
French
said.
“I
understand
these
are
hard
times
for
the
State
of
Maine
and
difficult
choices
had
to
be
made.
State
employees
have
had
to
shoulder
some
of
the
deficit
and
have
by
picking
up
part
of
their
state-paid
health
insurance
based
on
pay,
taking
unpaid
shutdown
days,
and
suspension
of
merit
increases.
However,
I
do
not
believe
that
it
was
the
intent
of
this
cost-saving
legislation
that
applied
to
the
suspension
of
longevity
payments
to
cause
the
action
that
actually
happened.”
Continuing,
Richard
French
said,
“Employees
who
were
already
receiving
longevity
payments
incurred
the
same
reductions
in
pay
as
other
employees
with
having
to
pay
part
of
their
health
insurance
and
losing
work
time
through
shutdown
days,
but
also
had
the
burden
of
having
their
salaries
(pay
per
hour)
cut,
the
only
sector
of
employees
to
have
this
happen.
The
approval
of
this
bill
(L.D.
1594)
will
correct
this.”
Richard
French’s
son,
Jonathan
French,
a
designer
for
the
Maine
Department
of
Transportation,
said
he
began
a
career
in
public
service
because
of
the
example
his
father
had
set.
“I
can
tell
you
my
father
is
my
role
model
for
his
dedication
and
service
to
the
State
of
Maine,”
Jonathan
French
said.
“Early
on
I
learned
the
value
of
state
service
through
him
and
that
is
why
I
am
a
state
employee
today.
I
cannot
begin
to
count
the
number
of
times
my
father
stayed
late
into
the
evening
at
work,
came
in
on
weekends,
or
even
in
the
early
morning
hours
all
without
compensation
to
fulfill
his
job
duties
and
more,
in
order
to
continue
to
provide
for
his
family,
but
most
importantly,
to
serve
the
Maine
public
and
ensure
their
public
health.
To
me,
he
has
more
than
earned
his
longevity
pay
for
the
dedication
he
has
shown
to
serving
Maine
citizens
throughout
his
career.”
Also
testifying
in
support
of
L.D.
1594
were
MSEA-SEIU
President
Bruce
Hodsdon
and
our
union’s
attorney
in
this
matter,
Jeffrey
Young.
“MSEA
believes
that
the
elimination
of
longevity
pay
is
illegal
because
it
has
had
a
disparate
impact
upon
employees
age
40
and
over,”
Young
said.
Our
Age-Discrimination
Complaints
We
are
continuing
to
pursue
the
class-action
discrimination
complaints
that
four
MSEA-SEIU
members
filed
on
behalf
of
all
state
worker
members
who
had
longevity
pay
removed
from
their
paychecks
in
the
two-year
state
budget
signed
by
the
Governor.
The
complaints
were
filed
with
the
Maine
Human
Rights
Commission,
which
is
a
partner
of
the
federal
Equal
Employment
Opportunity
Commission.
We
are
arguing
that
the
suspension
of
longevity
pay
violates
two
laws:
the
Age
Discrimination
in
Employment
Act
of
1967,
which
protects
workers
who
are
age
40
and
older
against
discrimination;
and
the
Maine
Human
Rights
Act,
which
also
prohibits
age
discrimination.
“We
continue
to
believe
that
the
elimination
of
longevity
pay
had
an
unlawful
disparate
impact
upon
older
state
employees
in
violation
of
the
Age
Discrimination
in
Employment
Act
and
that
the
Legislature’s
action
violated
the
due
process
clause
of
the
Maine
Constitution,”
Young
said.
"These
are
complex
legal
claims,
some
of
which
are
just
now
beginning
to
be
addressed
by
the
Maine
Human
Rights
Commission.”
Our
Memorandum
of
Agreement
with
the
Baldacci
Administration
Following
authorization
from
the
MSEA-SEIU
Board
of
Directors
last
month,
MSEA-SEIU
President
Bruce
Hodsdon,
MSEA-SEIU
Vice
President
Ginette
Rivard,
MSEA-SEIU
Interim
Executive
Director
Steve
Butterfield,
MSEA-SEIU
Political
Director
Mary
Anne
Turowski
and
MSEA-SEIU
General
Counsel
Roberta
de
Araujo
entered
into
negotiations
that
led
to
a
memorandum
of
agreement
with
the
Baldacci
adminstration
restoring
longevity
pay
beginning
July
1,
2010,
and
dropping
the
administration’s
proposed
three
additional
shutdown
days
beyond
the
20
already
booked.
The
agreement
was
signed
February
8.
This
memorandum
of
agreement,
which
remains
subject
to
legislative
approval,
does
contain
a
funding
mechanism.
The
agreement
will
be
funded
by
pushing
the
payroll
for
Cycle
“A”
employees
forward
by
48
hours
for
the
payday
currently
scheduled
for
Wednesday,
June
29,
2011.
Under
the
agreement,
instead
of
being
paid
on
that
day,
Cycle
“A”
employees
would
be
paid
on
Friday,
July
1,
2011.
All
other
paydays
would
remain
on
schedule.
In
addition
to
addressing
one
of
the
sorest
points
from
the
last
legislative
session
—
the
removal
of
longevity
pay
from
state
workers’
paychecks
outside
of
the
collective
bargaining
process
—
the
agreement
keeps
the
number
of
shutdown
days
scheduled
for
the
current
two-year
budget
at
20.
By
moving
the
payroll
currently
scheduled
for
Wedneday,
June
29,
2011,
forward
by
48
hours,
this
payroll
will
be
pushed
into
the
next
two-year
state
budget.
In
addition
to
providing
funding
to
restore
longevity
pay
and
eliminate
the
administration’s
proposed
three
additional
shutdown
days,
this
agreement
makes
millions
of
dollars
available
to
fund
critical
public
services
that
are
currently
threatened
by
the
$438
million
budget
gap.
This
could
lead
to
additional
matching
federal
funds
for
the
state
budget
depending
on
how
those
resources
are
allocated.